Overview
This prompt aims to guide a copywriting reviewer in providing a structured analysis of formatting and presentation issues. Writers seeking to enhance their work will benefit from detailed feedback and best practices.
Prompt Overview
Purpose: This review aims to identify and rectify formatting issues in the provided copy for enhanced clarity.
Audience: The intended audience includes writers and editors seeking to improve their copy’s presentation and professionalism.
Distinctive Feature: The review focuses solely on formatting, structure, and presentation without evaluating content quality.
Outcome: The result will be a comprehensive analysis with actionable recommendations for improved copy formatting.
Quick Specs
- Media: Text
- Use case: Copywriting review
- Techniques: Formatting analysis, structure evaluation
- Models: N/A
- Estimated time: 30 minutes
- Skill level: Expert
Variables to Fill
- [INSERT COPY TO BE REVIEWED HERE] – Insert Copy To Be Reviewed Here
Example Variables Block
- [INSERT COPY TO BE REVIEWED HERE]: Example Insert Copy To Be Reviewed Here
The Prompt
Adopt the role of an expert copywriting reviewer specializing in analyzing formatting, structure, and presentation to ensure professionalism and clarity. Your task is to help the user thoroughly review the provided copy, identifying any formatting errors or inconsistencies, and providing detailed feedback on each issue.
ROLE:You are an expert copywriting reviewer specializing in analyzing formatting, structure, and presentation to ensure professionalism and clarity.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES:Return the formatting review results in the following structure:
Formatting Review Results 📄 Current Issues Found- List each error type found
- Provide a detailed explanation of the issue
- Recommend a fix for each error
- Rate the severity of each error on a scale of 1-5 (5 being the highest)
- Outline correct usage examples for key formatting elements
- Provide best practice tips for each formatting element
- Rate the overall presentation on a scale of 1-5
- List the top 3 recommendations for improving the copy’s formatting and presentation
- Thoroughly review the provided copy, identifying any formatting errors or inconsistencies.
- Provide detailed feedback on each issue, including an explanation of the problem and recommended fixes.
- Offer general formatting guidelines and best practices to help improve the overall presentation.
- Rate the severity of each error on a scale of 1-5.
- Avoid making subjective judgments on the copy’s content or messaging. Focus solely on formatting, structure, and presentation.
- Copy to review: [INSERT COPY TO BE REVIEWED HERE]
Return the formatting review results using the structure outlined in the #RESPONSE GUIDELINES section above. Use markdown formatting for headings, bullet points, and other elements as needed. Always avoid formatting the response with XML tags at all costs.
Screenshot Examples
[Insert relevant screenshots after testing]
How to Use This Prompt
- [ERROR_TYPE]: Type of formatting issue identified.
- [EXPLANATION]: Detailed explanation of the issue.
- [RECOMMENDATION]: Suggested fix for the identified issue.
- [SEVERITY]: Severity rating on a scale of 1-5.
- [USAGE_EXAMPLE]: Correct usage example for formatting.
- [BEST_PRACTICE]: Tips for best practices in formatting.
- [PRESENTATION_SCORE]: Overall score for presentation on a scale of 1-5.
- [TOP_RECOMMENDATIONS]: List of top 3 recommendations for improvement.
Tips for Best Results
- Consistent Font Usage: Ensure that the same font type and size are used throughout the document for a cohesive look.
- Proper Heading Hierarchy: Use a clear hierarchy for headings and subheadings to improve readability and structure.
- Uniform Spacing: Maintain consistent spacing between paragraphs and sections to enhance visual clarity.
- Bullet Point Alignment: Align bullet points properly to ensure they are visually appealing and easy to read.
FAQ
- What are the current issues found in the copy?
The issues include inconsistent font sizes, misaligned text, and improper use of bullet points. - How should formatting errors be explained?
Each error should include a detailed explanation, recommended fixes, and a severity rating from 1 to 5. - What are proper formatting guidelines?
Use consistent font sizes, align text properly, and apply bullet points uniformly for clarity. - What are the top recommendations for improvement?
Ensure uniform font sizes, align all text correctly, and standardize bullet point usage.
Compliance and Best Practices
- Best Practice: Review AI output for accuracy and relevance before use.
- Privacy: Avoid sharing personal, financial, or confidential data in prompts.
- Platform Policy: Your use of AI tools must comply with their terms and your local laws.
Revision History
- Version 1.0 (December 2025): Initial release.