Overview
This prompt guides legal analysts in systematically evaluating case files to extract critical information. Legal professionals and law students will benefit from this structured approach to case analysis.
Prompt Overview
Purpose: This document aims to compile essential facts, arguments, and evidence from the case file for strategic analysis.
Audience: The intended audience includes legal professionals and analysts involved in case strategy development.
Distinctive Feature: This analysis emphasizes objectivity and confidentiality while evaluating the relevance of each piece of information.
Outcome: The result will be a comprehensive foundation for formulating an effective case strategy based on critical insights.
Quick Specs
- Media: Text
- Use case: Legal case analysis
- Techniques: Fact identification, Argument evaluation, Evidence cataloging
- Models: Legal expertise, Case strategy
- Estimated time: Several hours
- Skill level: Expert
Variables to Fill
- [CASE DETAILS] – Case Details
- [PLAINTIFF ARGUMENTS] – Plaintiff Arguments
- [DEFENDANT ARGUMENTS] – Defendant Arguments
- [EVIDENCE LIST] – Evidence List
- [POINTS OF INTEREST] – Points Of Interest
Example Variables Block
- [CASE DETAILS]: Car accident on Main St.
- [PLAINTIFF ARGUMENTS]: Defendant ran a red light.
- [DEFENDANT ARGUMENTS]: Plaintiff was speeding before collision.
- [EVIDENCE LIST]: Traffic camera footage, witness statements.
- [POINTS OF INTEREST]: Inconsistent witness testimonies noted.
The Prompt
#CONTEXT:
Adopt the role of an expert legal analyst with over 50 years of experience in law practice. Your task is to meticulously sift through a case file, identifying and documenting key facts, arguments from both parties, and evidence presented. This requires a detailed, objective approach to extract crucial information relevant to building a strategic case plan. Your extensive legal experience is instrumental in evaluating the significance and credibility of each piece of information. It is imperative to handle this information with utmost confidentiality and precision, ensuring it serves as a solid foundation for the case strategy.
#GOAL:
Compile a comprehensive list of critical facts, arguments from both parties, and any presented evidence directly from the case file. This will include a balanced evaluation of the information’s relevance and credibility, aiding in the formulation of an effective case strategy.
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
Follow this step-by-step approach to create the list:
- Read through the entire case file to gain an overall understanding of the case, its context, and the parties involved.
- Identify and document the key facts of the case:
- Focus on foundational elements such as:
- Dates
- Locations
- Individuals involved
- Specific actions or events central to the case
- Outline the arguments of both parties:
- Summarize the main points of contention, claims, and defenses presented by:
- The plaintiff
- The defendant
- Include legal theories they rely on and the outcomes they seek.
- Catalog the evidence provided:
- List all pieces of evidence submitted, including:
- Documents
- Testimonies
- Physical evidence
- Expert opinions
- Evaluate the credibility of each piece of evidence and its relevance to the arguments made by both sides.
- Assess the significance of each fact and piece of evidence:
- Use your legal expertise to judge the importance of information and its potential impact on the case.
- Consider how each fact supports or undermines the arguments of the parties involved.
- Maintain objectivity and confidentiality:
- Ensure all information is presented accurately and impartially, without revealing sensitive or identifying details unnecessarily.
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- Case details: [CASE DETAILS]
- Plaintiff’s arguments and desired outcomes: [PLAINTIFF ARGUMENTS]
- Defendant’s arguments and desired outcomes: [DEFENDANT ARGUMENTS]
- List of evidence provided: [EVIDENCE LIST]
- Any particular points of interest or concern in the case: [POINTS OF INTEREST]
#OUTPUT:
The output will be a detailed, structured list of key facts, arguments from both parties, and evidence, all assessed for their relevance and credibility. This list should serve as a foundational document for developing a strategic approach to the case, formatted clearly for easy reference and further analysis.
Screenshot Examples
[Insert relevant screenshots after testing]
How to Use This Prompt
- [CASE_DETAILS]: Overview of the case context.
- [PLAINTIFF_ARGUMENTS]: Claims and desired outcomes of plaintiff.
- [DEFENDANT_ARGUMENTS]: Claims and desired outcomes of defendant.
- [EVIDENCE_LIST]: Documents and testimonies presented in case.
- [POINTS_OF_INTEREST]: Specific concerns or notable aspects.
- [KEY_FACTS]: Important dates, locations, and individuals.
- [CREDIBILITY_ASSESSMENT]: Evaluation of evidence relevance and reliability.
- [CASE_STRATEGY]: Strategic approach based on findings.
Tips for Best Results
- Key Facts: Document essential details such as dates, locations, and individuals involved to establish the case context.
- Arguments Overview: Summarize the main claims and defenses from both the plaintiff and defendant, highlighting their legal theories and desired outcomes.
- Evidence Catalog: List all submitted evidence, including documents and testimonies, while assessing their credibility and relevance to the case.
- Significance Assessment: Evaluate the importance of each fact and piece of evidence in supporting or undermining the arguments of both parties.
FAQ
- What are the key facts of the case?
Key facts include dates, locations, individuals involved, and specific actions central to the case. - What are the plaintiff's main arguments?
The plaintiff claims negligence and seeks compensatory damages based on emotional distress and financial loss. - What evidence has been presented by both parties?
Evidence includes documents, testimonies, physical evidence, and expert opinions relevant to the arguments. - How should evidence be evaluated for credibility?
Evaluate evidence based on its source, relevance to the case, and how it supports or undermines arguments.
Compliance and Best Practices
- Best Practice: Review AI output for accuracy and relevance before use.
- Privacy: Avoid sharing personal, financial, or confidential data in prompts.
- Platform Policy: Your use of AI tools must comply with their terms and your local laws.
Revision History
- Version 1.0 (December 2025): Initial release.