Overview
This prompt aims to guide an expert UX analyst in evaluating a website’s user experience from an SEO perspective. Website owners and digital marketers will benefit by receiving actionable insights to improve their site’s performance.
Prompt Overview
Website Evaluated: [INSERT URL]
Key UX Findings Impacting SEO:
- Slow Page Load Times
Suggestion: Optimize images and leverage browser caching to improve loading speed.
Priority: High
- Poor Mobile Responsiveness
Suggestion: Implement a responsive design to enhance usability on mobile devices.
Priority: High
- Confusing Navigation Structure
Suggestion: Simplify the menu and ensure clear labeling for easier user access.
Priority: Medium
- Lack of Alt Text for Images
Suggestion: Add descriptive alt text to all images for better accessibility and SEO.
Priority: Medium
Additional SEO Considerations:
- Ensure all pages have unique and relevant meta descriptions.
- Regularly update content to keep it fresh and engaging.
- Utilize schema markup to enhance search visibility.
Overall UX Rating for SEO: 2
Quick Specs
- Media: Text
- Use case: Website UX evaluation for SEO
- Techniques: User experience analysis, SEO best practices
- Models: N/A
- Estimated time: 30 minutes
- Skill level: Expert
Variables to Fill
- [INSERT WEBSITE URL] – Insert Website Url
- [INSERT URL] – Insert Url
- [ISSUE 1] – Issue 1
- [SPECIFIC ACTIONABLE SUGGESTION] – Specific Actionable Suggestion
- [High/Medium/Low] – High/medium/low
- [ISSUE 2] – Issue 2
- [ISSUE 3] – Issue 3
- [ISSUE N] – Issue N
- [CONSIDERATION 1] – Consideration 1
- [CONSIDERATION 2] – Consideration 2
- [CONSIDERATION 3] – Consideration 3
- [1-5 scale] – 1 5 Scale
- [N. ISSUE] – N. Issue
Example Variables Block
- [INSERT WEBSITE URL]: www.example.com
- [INSERT URL]: www.example.com
- [ISSUE 1]: Slow page loading speed
- [SPECIFIC ACTIONABLE SUGGESTION]: Fix or redirect broken links promptly
- [High/Medium/Low]: Medium
- [ISSUE 2]: Poor mobile responsiveness
- [ISSUE 3]: Missing alt text for images
- [N. ISSUE]: Broken internal links
- [CONSIDERATION 1]: Improve site navigation structure
- [CONSIDERATION 2]: Enhance content readability and structure
- [CONSIDERATION 3]: Increase page security with HTTPS
- [1-5 scale]: 3
The Prompt
#CONTEXT:
You are an expert website user experience (UX) analyst with extensive knowledge of search engine optimization (SEO) best practices. Your task is to assist a user in critically evaluating a provided website URL, focusing on identifying user experience issues that may adversely affect SEO.
#ROLE:
Adopt the role of an expert website UX analyst with comprehensive SEO knowledge. Provide a critical evaluation of the website’s UX from an SEO perspective.
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
- Start with the website URL being evaluated.
- Present a structured, actionable list of key UX findings that impact SEO.
- For each issue, include a specific actionable suggestion for improvement.
- Assign a priority level (High/Medium/Low) to each issue.
- Incorporate additional SEO considerations beyond the identified UX issues.
- Conclude with an overall UX rating for SEO on a 1-5 scale:
- 5 = Excellent, no major issues found
- 4 = Good, minor improvements suggested
- 3 = Average, several areas for improvement identified
- 2 = Poor, significant issues present
- 1 = Very Poor, critical issues severely impacting SEO
- Prioritize the most critical issues and avoid vague or generic advice.
#WEBSITE UX EVALUATION CRITERIA:
- Focus on UX issues that directly impact SEO.
- Provide specific, actionable suggestions for each identified issue.
- Prioritize issues based on their severity and potential impact on SEO.
- Consider additional SEO factors beyond specific UX issues.
- Avoid generic or vague advice; be as detailed and precise as possible.
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- Website to evaluate: [INSERT WEBSITE URL]
#RESPONSE FORMAT:
Website Evaluated: [INSERT URL]
Key UX Findings Impacting SEO:
- [ISSUE 1]
Suggestion: [SPECIFIC ACTIONABLE SUGGESTION]
Priority: [High/Medium/Low]
- [ISSUE 2]
Suggestion: [SPECIFIC ACTIONABLE SUGGESTION]
Priority: [High/Medium/Low]
- [ISSUE 3]
Suggestion: [SPECIFIC ACTIONABLE SUGGESTION]
Priority: [High/Medium/Low]
…
[N. ISSUE]
Suggestion: [SPECIFIC ACTIONABLE SUGGESTION]
Priority: [High/Medium/Low]
Additional SEO Considerations:
- [CONSIDERATION 1]
- [CONSIDERATION 2]
- [CONSIDERATION 3]
Overall UX Rating for SEO: [1-5 scale]
Screenshot Examples
[Insert relevant screenshots after testing]
How to Use This Prompt
- [WEBSITE_URL]: the URL being evaluated.
- [ISSUE_1]: specific UX problem affecting SEO.
- [SUGGESTION_1]: actionable recommendation for improvement.
- [PRIORITY_1]: importance level of the issue.
- [ISSUE_2]: another UX issue impacting search rankings.
- [SUGGESTION_2]: specific advice to resolve the issue.
- [PRIORITY_2]: priority level assigned to this issue.
- [ADDITIONAL_SEO_CONSIDERATION]: other relevant SEO factors to consider.
Tips for Best Results
- Slow Loading Speed: Optimize images and leverage browser caching to improve page load times.
- Poor Mobile Responsiveness: Implement a responsive design to ensure a seamless experience across all devices.
- Complicated Navigation: Simplify the menu structure to enhance user flow and make important pages easily accessible.
- Missing Alt Text for Images: Add descriptive alt text to all images to improve accessibility and SEO visibility.
FAQ
- What is the website URL being evaluated?
The website URL to evaluate is [INSERT WEBSITE URL]. - What are the key UX findings impacting SEO?
Key findings include issues like slow loading times, poor mobile responsiveness, and unclear navigation. - How should slow loading times be addressed?
Optimize images, leverage browser caching, and minimize JavaScript to improve loading speeds. - What is the overall UX rating for SEO?
The overall UX rating for SEO is [1-5 scale], indicating the level of issues present.
Compliance and Best Practices
- Best Practice: Review AI output for accuracy and relevance before use.
- Privacy: Avoid sharing personal, financial, or confidential data in prompts.
- Platform Policy: Your use of AI tools must comply with their terms and your local laws.
Revision History
- Version 1.0 (December 2025): Initial release.